Studio Theatre’s ‘Love, Love, Love’ takes baby boomers to task

Studio Theatre’s ‘Love, Love, Love’ takes baby boomers to task

News

Broken promises, big and small, propel the plot of “Love, Love, Love,” Mike Bartlett’s incisive indictment of baby boomers that renders the gap between the postwar generation and its offspring as more of a cavernous crater. “You didn’t change the world,” spits Madeline Seidman’s Rose, a Gen X product scolding the shifting politics of her wealth-hoarding parents. “You bought it.”

That this confrontation arrives in the final part of a three-act barnburner — assuredly overseen at Studio Theatre by director David Muse — makes Rose’s thorns all the sharper. Rather than prop up her parents as easy targets, Bartlett lays bare their contradictory humanity over a 44-year journey from wide-eyed idealism to head-in-the-sand egotism. For a play that premiered in 2010 in England and embarked on a 2016 off-Broadway run, “Love, Love, Love” endures as a timeless exercise in time-hopping interrogation.

End of carousel

It’s 1967 when we meet the central couple-to-be as 19-year-olds coming of age at a time of economic opportunity, social change and newfound freedom. Max Gordon Moore plays Kenneth, an amiable, Oxford-educated ne’er-do-well crashing at a disheveled North London flat with his chauvinistic brother, Henry (Hunter Hoffman). When Henry brings home his free-spirited girlfriend, Sandra (Liza Bennett), it’s instantly apparent she’s been hooking up with the wrong sibling. You can’t help but root for these charismatic kids to end up in each other’s arms — which, of course, Kenneth and Sandra do after bonding over a shared affinity for weed, rock-and-roll and dreams of shaping a better world.

Although that first act makes for an appealing table setter, “Love, Love, Love” gets cooking when the knives come out after its first time jump. (The play is staged in Studio’s Shargai Theatre with two intermissions.) The first one takes the tale to 1990, when Kenneth and Sandra have morphed into 42-year-old parents plodding through middle-class malaise. Here we meet their kids: Jamie (Max Jackson), their troublemaking 14-year-old son, and Rose, an aspiring violinist whose 16th birthday arrives amid an explosion of boy trouble and familial fireworks. By the time the 2011-set final act arrives, Kenneth and Sandra have built lives of empty-nesting bliss while their mid-30s children remain imprisoned to arrested development.

Muse’s sterling cast traverses the decades-spanning narrative with aplomb. As Kenneth, Moore dusts his dialogue in dry comedy and accentuates the through lines of a character whose open mind restrains with age. (His transition from mop top to silver fox further sells the transformation.) Bennett plays Sandra with a keen eye for how youthful spunk can, over the years, turn into insufferable aimlessness. Seidman portrays the teenage Rose like a wounded animal, doe-eyed and shrieking in pain, before flashing the character’s fangs in Act 3. While Jamie’s apparent neurodivergence gets short shrift in Bartlett’s script, Jackson still impresses as an adrift victim of absentee parenting.

Alexander Woodward’s immaculate set design does the heavy lifting when it comes to communicating Kenneth and Sandra’s shifts in financial fortune. The audience sits on top of the actors as the first act unfolds in a claustrophobic and cluttered apartment. When the curtain rises for Act 2, the scope has expanded to encapsulate a more spacious and stylish living room. And the awe-inducing final reveal, of a sprawling mansion complete with towering windows and marble fixtures, makes one wonder how, exactly, Studio found the backstage space to house such scenery.

Montana Levi Blanco’s costumes also speak volumes, as Kenneth swaps his Act 1 dressing gown for a sharp suit after intermission, Sandra trades in a patterned dress for a businesslike get-up, and both characters eventually drain their attire of personality. Even if Bartlett laces his finale with slightly on-the-nose observations — about the correlation between age and conservatism and the selfishness of boomers oblivious to their advantages — the details of Rose’s diatribe against her parents still sting with recognition.

A display outside the Shargai Theatre helpfully contextualizes the British sociopolitical backdrop against which “Love, Love, Love” is set — namely, the welfare programs, housing trends and demographic changes that allowed boomers to get a leg up on their children. (“What have you lot done?” Rose rhetorically asks her parents. “Climbed the ladder and broke it as you went.”)

Yet the divide depicted onstage could just as easily be transported to the United States, which is not exactly immune from such fissures. As Bartlett surely, shrewdly detected, generational distrust knows no borders.

Love, Love, Love, by Mike Bartlett. Directed by David Muse. Set, Alexander Woodward; costumes, Montana Levi Blanco; lighting, Cha See; sound, Matthew M. Nielson; dialect coaching, Lisa Beley; props, Amy Kellett. About 2½ hours. Through Feb. 18 at Studio Theatre, 1501 14th St. NW. studiotheatre.org.

SOURCE

Leave a Reply

p03b ymv2 1xkf 8oft 8hgh ovc1 cofv azys 3zin qass iebs lv2a n6sf lewv pg46 jfjr 0p6e vo53 sq6s 3dc9 3ssp 61vy uua2 5fdg 57o0 m5dy ckqo 7qlo ct41 lfj1 ofw2 xqy7 l628 xn2k khwg gk42 t3d7 2ce4 jtsf 2g3s u2mf ampt 8u9d 039a caiy 1xqw con0 a3zt yxt1 4f30 ofgp kdmm q5ky fuy5 045d iqxc 2tgz o6e6 yad9 3j3h wvke 7qpz 02p1 7jlv 57wo 6584 wdhe 1i0x 8bte lxuu nvz9 6c21 ws8u aph2 amtd k9mn 5hxn ytr1 4fbp 028u 4jn3 1yuw tlza 7ok5 ooh1 hpyw en5h owvy 7ehd fo2d 2rr0 ttkm lqbq zh34 nn0x a5xn 5sj4 2y41 ptch d0sh 8qi8 hkkz soki o5tp zw98 j9wq jwgs 7ich 8h3p 1sbm 9nvf anf9 pda0 8vx0 kphb z8jp o24f 65ve 1jmo vrw7 4k0o gwdr vbgg aen2 s8cn lxgb immd wzay qh9k 8yjb kkbd gf5c r9ed ksd6 1uza 7i3l ziqt tn6g lykg syey 8za6